Copyright "Censorship"

I have come to the opinion that companies are shooting themselves in the foot with this strict, draconian enforcement of copyrights online. By "companies", I mean ALL media companies: music, TV, motion picture, video games, ect. They all make forced deletion of ANYthing that they believe violates their copyright, (or harrass/threaten posters until they "voluntarily" remove their content). This has the same effect as "censorship" of anything copyrighted.

I think that they're losing more in publicity than they're gaining in sales. I actually "shop" for music on youtube... it beats 30 second samples of music from amazon or similar sites. The videos that got me to buy CDs by certain obscure bands: gone. The videos that made Supreme Commander look so awesome I bought it: gone. In some cases, I no longer remember the names of the bands or songs I was looking at on youtube. That's lost sales, right there. So, in my mind, allowing content to be leaked is as good or better than a trailer. But, of course, in the eyes of the companies, I'm just a twisted anti-captialist marxist thieving internet pirate... just like every other one of their customers.

I'm starting to seriously wonder... how long can one treat their customer base like vermin and stay in business? In the case of the media companies, might not be as long as they think...

"Music sales fell to their lowest level in at least 10 years..."
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/18/technology/music.php

"...14.5% fall in overall DVD sales last year."
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2009/tc2009024_458580.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech

Big Brother is now a reality in the UK

Looks the the UK is wasting no time slipping into a totalitarian state.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5439604.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797084

Now, at this point, I know many readers out there are thinking "They're only spying on criminals, doing illegal things." Unfortunately that "I'm honest, so I have nothing to hide" mentality is a trap.

Now, what specifically could carry sentences of 3 or more years that could be on someone's computer? Perhaps this has something to do with the UK's recent ban on "extreme pornography".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7364475.stm

Yes, there are arguments on both sides of the issue, but it seems to be only a short step between that and banning other types of pornography, if not other types of expression, from the internet. And this is assuming everyone in the British government has the best of intentions and only bans things that are legitimately illegal... and doesn't use these new self-granted powers to attack free speech or criticism of the government.

Oops! There goes an entire internet archive!
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/demon_muzzles_wayback_machine/

So now that they've proven their heavy-handed draconian intentions, who's next? How many private citizens will be jailed for private possession of pornography even if they just keep it to themselves? Prior to recent years, only fundamentalist theocracies such as Iran had "morality police." Now modern democracies such as Britain can boast that wonderful distinction as well.

I have another reason for disliking this policy. I consider this an invasion of not just personal privacy, but home and property. My internet-age sensibilities are that a PC, and its contents are someone's personal property. I have no protest if the authorities were to procure a warrant to sieze and search my PC. But this is searching without a warrant by using spyware! Something that is, by definition illegal.

So, the message here is: hacking is ok if the government does it? Malware is by definition illegal, unless it's government malware? The hypocricy of this double-standard sickens me.

This is one time I'm very glad to be living "across the pond" from the Brits. No matter how bad the threats to personal liberty have been in the US, things seem to be slipping into Orwell's police state over there ten times faster. I can only hope other countries don't take a page from Britain's draconian internet bans, and that it remains an isolated example.

Remember: In the Information Wars, don't worry about what you can see... worry about what you can no longer see.

"Choice" is a loaded word now?

Why do I think most conservatives are nutjobs? Because they are. This speaks for itself...

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2009/01/pro-life_group_up_in_arms_over.php

Surveilance

Today I overheard a discussion about politics. Now, mostly it was about how the US economy is tanking, and how bad a president Bush has been (thank gods he'll be gone soon!) and other relatively rational opinions. Except then I heard "I don't get what all the fuss about the Patriot Act is all about. I don't have any problem with them listening in on my telephone conversations or reading my emails. If I say something I shouldn't, then I should be locked up."

Well, now I'm going to put my two cents in on what all the fuss about the government spying on US citizens is all about.

It's easy to think "Well, I'm a decent, law-abiding person, so if the government or police or FBI were to start listening in on me, I've got nothing to hide." This is the founding philosophy behind sites like myspace and livejournal, and also reality TV. But it's a terrible trap to fall into. There seems to be this growing sense in recent years that "privacy" is some archaic, out-modeled social idea left over from the Victorian Age, right alongside segregation and eugenics. People who, like me, still consider personal privacy an important right are becoming fewer and fewer in number.

We are treading on thin ice here. Sure, you may think your lifestyle and opinions are perfectly normal, but there is a huge variety of things that while seemingly normal, someone is going to be offended over. For starters, spending any amount of time in close quarters with some friend you thought you knew well (such as a sleepover or camping trip) will reveal that there is a huge range of preferences in personal hygene, including practices that will most likely offend you. It's not too far a stretch of the imagination that some of your routine personal cleaning will offend somebody. Then, of course, there are the parts of one's lifestyle generally best left unsaid: politics, religion, sexual orientation.

I highly doubt you could find 10 members of some minority lifestyle or opinion, 10 gays, 10 neopagans, 10 transexuals, 10 Ralph Nader supporters, ect, who would agree it's a great idea to have "nothing to hide" to the point they would think it a good idea to let their boss and coworkers know such details about their private lives. Now imagine that we had this wonderful "transparent society" where due to surveilance the government knew such details about everyone, including you.

Just stop for a minute, poke around google or youtube or something, and think it over. If you don't get chills up your spine, you are both naieve, and already standing in line to become one of big brother's sheep.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say there will always be a person who would be offended by your lifestyle, and your beliefs. Maybe some prudish public servant on the other side of the cameras would find one of your kinks an offensive "perversion" worthy of stamping out. Nothing like sexual preferences to raise somebody's ire. Maybe some zealot of [insert religion here] would see your faith (or lack thereof) as an "abomination" that should never be practiced. After all, religion is just such a great starter of flame wars, (and real ones!)

More to the point, do you really want the government to know everything that you say all the time? Who among us can honesty say they didn't, at one time or another, blurt out in an angry moment how this or that person should die?

I will put myself on the spot here and say that, while I'm not the perfect model of citizenship, I do vote, and have not commited any crimes beyond a few traffic tickets. And yet, I have, in private, throughout my life, advocated horrible fates to some people. In high school, me and my friends used to draw cartoons of kids and teachers we didn't like meeting horrible ends. Even now, some of my professors end up in the margins of my homework and notebooks, always about to suffer a terrible fate. I have, in anger, advocated the destruction of certain countries, and death to certain groups of people. (Most notably nuking Islamic countries, drowning large numbers of lawyers, hanging terrorists and pirates, and the like.) And that's just the tip of the iceberg!

None of this I ever meant seriously. But if there was a government surveilance program listening in at all times, would they know that? If the people running it had the (lack of) sense of humor of, say, airport security workers, I daresay I would (gods forbid) be in jail already for some "terrorist plot".

Just stop for a minute and think about your own private conversations and tell me you have never, ever, wished death or suffering on somebody. Even if it was just for a moment in a fit of anger. Then tell me with a straight face you would like Homeland Security agents listening in on that, all the time.

Think it over.

The Day the Future Died...

The new year has come and gone, and like everybody else, I've gotten a bit reflective with the change in calendar.

It seems like back in the 90s, everyone in the industrialized world was aglow with the notion of progress, technology, and a brighter future. Magazine articles and TV programming was awash in futurism. For many people in the modern world, the biggest issues facing the world were the social problems we were going to run into from future technologies. Advances, problems and solutions in nanotechnology, genetics, AI, the internet, were on the tip of everyone's tongue. Down to Earth folks who never talked about "pie in the sky" dreams were suddenly striking up conversations about future technology.

And then suddenly, as the change of millenium came and went, the notions of boundless technology, of improving our lives through science, of progress, and a better world withered and died. Almost overnight, we stopped caring about any of that "future" shit and started worrying about terrorist attacks, environmental decay, and poverty. And when the future does come up in the popular sci-fi, it is dark, (in many cases literally dark, as a matter of artistic style), and riddled with grim conflict. And I think I know the exact moment our outlook as a world changed...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1Dg2eEhB30
*conspiracy theorists take note: at 2:25 you can see the steel buckling INWARDS on its own*

This act struck deep into the soul of the Western world. Progress got a bloody nose when the tallest buildings in the world were destroyed. Some, even in America, began to question our own actions and policies and seemed to take the criticisms of Western society from the Islamists to heart. And all the world's dialogue shifted, from worrying about problems from out own progress per se, to worrying about terrorism, war, and environmental decay. And in that respect, I believe the terrorists WERE successful in spreading a blanket of fear, and spreading their message.

I think this shift in our dialogue as a society could very well cause problems in the future. We have largely stopped talking about the potential pros, cons, and dangers of genetics, nanotechnology, cloning, the social impact of the web, and other emerging technologies. And we may very well find ourselves blindsided by issues from those technologies in the future. In other worlds, if we're not careful, our new vision of a dark future may very well become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Strategy

For two weeks now, the entire gay community has been mobilized against the passage of anti-gay measures in several states, Poposition 8 in California in particular.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/us/16protest.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&bl&ei=5087&en=719e1c29c315aea6&ex=1226984400

Great idea... except it's already passed! Much as it pains me to admit it, the fight's done and lost. Time to start thinking about the next one. And with that in mind, I have a little advice to any and all members of the gay community who may chance upon this... so listen up!

Why didn't you think of this sooner? Why weren't you holding these rallies in the two weeks before the vote on Nov 4th? It's entirely possible that if you had made this much noise before the vote, you just might have been able to sway enough people to your side to make Prop 8 fail! Next time there's a vote on gay issues anywhere in the country, think about how awful it feels right now to have your rights taken away from you, before the vote, and get out there it when it stands a chance of doing some good!

Thoughts on Prop 8

Well, Proposal 8 passed in California... like none of us saw that one coming. So now, despite what the state supreme court ruled, the state constitution has been amended, permanently re-defining marriage as one man, one woman... ironically in the state that has the largest gay population in the nation.

Anti-gay state constitution amendments were approved by the voters in Arizona and Florida as well.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/05/state.laws/

So this country is enlightened enough to let a black man be president, (and one with liberal policies at that) but still in the dark ages about homosexuality. Go figure.

Yesterday, I stumbled upon a very interesting article, about the hidden cost of forcing straight marriage upon everyone regardless of sexual orientation... written by an insider to one such marriage. While I already supported gay marriage on principle, my eyes have been opened to the cost to traditional heterosexual marriage, and the nuclear family, by pushing gays to follow everyone else's conventional lifestyle. It's counter-intuitive, but legalizing gay marriage, it turns out, is the best "defense" of straight marriage.

http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid:37602

Enjoy the fruits of your labor!